购彩大厅Welcome返点-企业百科

来源：购彩大厅Welcome开户2024-02-10 17:48

购彩大厅Welcome返点

如何高质量建设涉台经济合作园区？福建省人大代表助解“成长的烦恼”******

　　(台海观澜)如何高质量建设涉台经济合作园区？福建省人大代表助解“成长的烦恼”

　　中新社福州1月14日电 (记者龙敏)改革开放以来，福建先后设立台商投资区、台湾农民创业园等各种涉台经济合作园区，有效推进了闽台经贸交流合作。但目前，涉台经济合作园区频遇政策优势不明显、台资项目及人才数量少、引才环境还不够优化等“成长的烦恼” 。

　　在正于福州举行的福建省十四届人大一次会议上，福建省省长赵龙表示，将高质量建设台商投资区、台湾农民创业园等涉台经济合作园区。与会人大代表也纷纷建言，加快推动涉台经济合作园区转型升级，提升闽台产业融合与经济交流承载力，助力福建加快建设台胞台企登陆的第一家园。

　　福建现有6个国家级台湾农民创业园，数量居大陆首位，已吸引天福集团、漳州钜宝生物等一批台企进驻。但是，这些台农创业园及台企在升级发展中也面临基础设施较薄弱、销售“水土不服”等现象。

　　福建省人大代表、漳平市市长李毓文接受中新社记者采访时指出，有着“大陆阿里山”之称的漳平国家级台湾农民创业园内，台农生产的永福高山茶品质佳，但因品牌营销不到位等原因，茶叶卖不动、品牌打不响、特色难彰显。

　　他建议，进一步支持国家级台湾农民创业园高质量发展，重点扶持产业发展、项目建设等，对引进台湾高层次人才给予倾斜支持；积极引导台农开拓市场，指导互联网平台协助销售永福高山茶等台农生产产品。

　　泉州台商投资区是福建省6个国家级台商投资区之一，已引进颐和医院、德润产业园等168家台企，总投资202亿元(人民币，下同)，并引进132名台湾高层次人才。

　　福建省人大代表、泉州弘晟精密塑胶模具有限公司董事长郭炳森说，目前，泉州台商投资区存在财税、医疗器械和药品市场准入等政策“瓶颈”，全区规模以上台资企业仅6家，企业体量较小。

　　郭炳森建议，适当放宽市场准入条件，赋予更多惠台利民举措，鼓励和支持拓宽应通尽通新路径。

　　漳州古雷石化基地是国家发改委唯一确认的大陆台湾石化产业园区，截至目前已投产、在建、签约产业项目48个，总投资3226亿元。福建省人大代表、漳州市政协副主席戴鹏飞建议，要积极创造合作共赢的长效机制与新型合作模式，利用海峡论坛、两岸企业家峰会等平台，深化闽台石化产业对接合作，继续引进一批台湾补链项目、延伸项目、升级项目；用好《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP)，抓住当前东南亚石化市场超景气周期，将产品销售出去。

　　平潭是大陆唯一对台综合实验区，致力于打造台湾同胞“第二生活圈”，具有独特的区位、通道、政策优势。福建省人大代表、福建医科大学党委书记陈晓春指出，平潭已实现对台主要港口客货航线全覆盖，进出平潭岛陆路物流双通道也已经形成，两岸人货往来、贸易通关便利；占地面积约100亩的平潭海峡医药健康产业园，为打造两岸中药材贸易集散地提供了载体。

　　陈晓春建议，在平潭设立两岸中医药标准分中心，探索两岸中医药标准互认互通；将平潭作为大陆对台中药材主要输出口岸，推进标准化、集约化、规模化运作；在平潭设立两岸乃至国际中医药论坛、产业交流大会，加强中医药交流合作。(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之” ，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝” ，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.